Find two current article (2 weeks or newer) dealing with one of the first ten amendments. Read the article. Add the link to your blog and give a response to the articles.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The highest measure of democracy is neither the 'extent of freedom' nor the 'extent of equality', but rather the highest measure of participation. A. d. Benoist
37 comments:
Anthony Smith
http://hubpages.com/hub/Censorship-In-America
this is violating freedom of the interwebs of freedom of expression, speech, and press its blocked way to go public education
Anthony Smith
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091001/ap_on_re_us/us_empire_state_building_china_5
people are pissed for no reason these people have the freedom of religion or whatever it is that they were doing for the holiday so whaddup bill of rights?
Anthony Smith
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091001/ap_on_re_us/us_empire_state_building_china_5
people are pissed for no reason these people have the freedom of religion or whatever it is that they were doing for the holiday so whaddup bill of rights?
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2009/10/01/20091001scotus1001.html
I don't think they should take away the right to bear arms. It's in the NATIONAL constitution.
deviantart.com
That website is blocked by the school, thus impairing our 1st ammendment rights. It is a sight to "Express yourself and artistic creations" (freedom of speech), and it is taken away from us.
http://www.examiner.com/x-11748-Jefferson-County-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m10d1-Supreme-Court-to-rule-on-second-amendment
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/01/taking_liberties/entry5356494.shtml
These show how the right to own guns has come under a lot of competition recently that may violate 2nd amendment rights.
test
http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/18/sampling-the-ways-democrats-want-to-amend-the-baucus-plan/?scp=2&sq=amendments&st=cse
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/health/policy/02tax.html?scp=9&sq=amendments&st=cse
Well one article deals with more about the amendments then the other, the first one speaks on behalf of the history of the amendments an how many there are. the next deals with people speaking about taxes and how far we've come since the bill of rights was written.
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/category/current-events/ I agree with this article and what they did because same sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts and they can marry whoever they see fit.
Link1) http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2009/10/01/20091001scotus1001.html
1. I think that any ban against guns is unjust even if they are the cause of mass crimes. The right to bear arms is just as much a reason to protect your family as it is to serve your country.
Link2)
http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2009/09/30/20090930franks0930.html
2. The senator who denounced Obama in my opinion is stupid but as a citizen of the united states and under the constitution he is protected by his write to press and speech.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/01/us/01scotus.html?hp
It is great that they make gun laws that do not infringe the second amendment. Because that many people would get angry is one of the most important amendments was infringed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091002/ap_on_re_us/us_texas_soldier_found;_ylt=Av6W1FvrrOUiEi_6tJWuK1Cs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTFlOTZldTVxBHBvcwM3MARzZWMDYWNjb3JkaW9uX3Vfc19uZXdzBHNsawN0ZXhhc3NvbGRpZXI-
Texas soldier pleads guilty in kidnapping hoax:
5th amendment: plead the 5th! he doesnt have to talk, he doesnt have to confess, it is his choice.
it is also his 1st, freedom of speech because if he wants say he is not guilty, and is innocent then again it is his choice.
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/washington-post-to-staff-twitterers-watch-your-mouth/?scp=7&sq=1st%20amendment&st=cse
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/09/29/us/politics/AP-US-Ashcroft-Lawsuit.html?_r=1&scp=4&sq=fourth%20amendment&st=cse
the first one is about how the government told people to stop bloging about them and or the Country
and they can't do that.
the 2nd one says that the goerment did and illegal unreasonable searches agenst the bush ademenisration.
ARTICAL #1
http://voiceofsikkim.com/2009/09/18/doctors-to-get-10-years-jail-for-illegal-organ-trade/
I think that illegal trading of organs is wrong and just disgusting I cant believe that some one would actually trade a organ just for money
ARTICAL# 2
azcentral.com: Man with AR-15 rifle at Obama rally sparks concerns
President barrack obama wants to get rid of guns. I don't that he should take them away I think that they could be pretty usfull Especially if someone tries to break in you have a weapon to defend yourself . And in some cases it would be good to take them away like in school shootings
ARTICAL #1
http://voiceofsikkim.com/2009/09/18/doctors-to-get-10-years-jail-for-illegal-organ-trade/
I think that illegal trading of organs is wrong and just disgusting I cant believe that some one would actually trade a organ just for money
ARTICAL# 2
azcentral.com: Man with AR-15 rifle at Obama rally sparks concerns
President barrack obama wants to get rid of guns. I don't that he should take them away I think that they could be pretty usfull Especially if someone tries to break in you have a weapon to defend yourself . And in some cases it would be good to take them away like in school shootings
http://localsearch.azcentral.com/sp?catId=&aff=1100&searchkeyword=&searchcategory=*&azcHomeSearchButton=&keywords=rights+of+bear+arms+&address=&x=0&y=0
People that are armed are feeling threatened because people are trying to take them away and make a law that bear arms are not legal.
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/article
it's so stupid what America is doing now a days. They can't take away the right to bare arms... it's in the constitution. And we should still be following it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/26/nyregion/26daylabor.html
The cases still dealing with immigrants arrests deals with the bill of rights and peoples freedom in our country. I believe this is a large issue that is not going away, and needs to be addressed.
www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2009/10/01/20091001scotus1001.html
This is violating amendment 2. We should be aloud to keep the rights of bear arms for or own protection. Those that use the gun for murder should be put away. But don't take our rights away. There are lots of crazy people in the world and we need to protect ourselves and loved ones.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/01/us/01scotus.html?_r=1
I think the gun control laws shouldn't be changed, they work and they're perfect and anyone who wants to change it is an unethical and lame.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/19/us/19scotus.html
Free speech shan't be feddled with on my watch
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articl
i dont think that the second amendment should be interfered with. the right to bear arms is a rite that i hold dear. i am a sportsman and i shoot. i would be very angry if my right was takin away!
http://www.azcentral.com/12news/news/articles/2009/10/01/20091001taxbills1001-CP.html
I personally think the people trying to pay the bill that they physically dont have is truly ridiculous because they are being charged more money because the government is the ones responsible and if we, people who own land, are protected by the first amendment why are we being charged for the governments failure.
http://www.azfamily.com/news/local/60278697.html
The senator has the right to veto anything she wants.
Alyssa Perry
People are saying that law makers need to show respect to others. There first speech is wrong they have to show respect
http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/Johnstake/63857
this article is about repealing the second amendment. WHAAT??? you can't take away the peoples rights to bare arms. people have a right to carry weapons incase there is ever a case where it is necesary to use them. you can't just take that away.
ttp://www.myfoxphoenix.com/search/SERP?search_type=site&top_search_field=ten+amendment&sm=&srm=&startIndex=0¤tPage=1
Well were really not following the first amendment. Some times people just skip right past the first amendment. And The second amendment you cant bear arms unless you have a permit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/us/politics/26scotus.html
its just bad that they would do that
and didnt give her her rights.
www.azcentral.com/business/consumer/articles/2009/10/02/20091002botoxmaker.html
Why would doctors banned the labels on the drugs they give us. They are violating amendment 1. The botox company have the right to put whats in the medication they are giving to people. People die from taking to medicines that are not aloud to be taking together but doctors don't tell their patients that. The are murderers.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/01/taking_liberties/entry5354594.shtml its not good that america is trying to get rid of our guns because it is in the constitiution
http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/4098
I think that Obamas trying to use gun control is not right. People will always keep guns bad or good kinds, not to mention even if he took every gun away criminals would still find some form of means to get one.
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/sep/29/cheerleaders-religious-signs-draw-fire/
This challanges people on both sides of the fence in the 1st ammendment. I don't believe people should have religion forced on them, but I don't believe atheists shouldn't let the christians or any other religion do their own thing. I think its not right to make people pray or force religion on them so I disagree with them challenging the 1st ammendment
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/us/politics/26scotus.html
she derserved her rights
http://www.abcnews.go.com/WN/football-cheerleaders-god-room-religion-football-field/story?id=8725415#
The school is aloud to put up banners and such during the games. Because they have the right to express there religion. Also it protects there fredom of speach.
1.
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles
I think banning guns is not right, people should definitely be able to bear arms, to not only feel safe but also to protect themselves.
2.http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/health/policy/02tax.html?scp=9&sq=amendments&st=cse
this article refers to people using their first amendment and speaking about taxes and what's changed since they first wrote the bill of rights.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/a-baby-for-the-gay-authors-behind-the-daddy-penguins/?scp=5&sq=first%20amendment&st=cse
I personally believe that this book would be a little confusing for children in elementry school. When you are young you are tought that it takes a mom and a dad to make a baby, so when you put two dads in the picture it makes it harder for parents to explain that to their kids. Though the First Amendment protects the book anyways.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/speech/studentexpression/topic.aspx?topic=clothing_dress_codes_uniforms
This article really makes you think about your rights and if it is in fact violating your first amendment. I dont think it is, just because you dont have to go to a school with a dress code their for you dont have to wear that attire.
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/category/current-even
I agree with this article, people should get to marry whoever they want even if it is a little out of the ordinary, but then again out society isn't really normal anymore.
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/article
Government should not take away the right to bare arms because it is in the constitution and Americans should have the right to protect themselves.
http://www.onlinelegaltips.com/human-rights/violation-of-human-rights-by-censoring-internet.html
Violation of Human rights by censoring the internet: I think what they are doing is ridiculous. If they do not want the public to see confidential material over the internet, shouldn't it not be there in the first place? If you are so worried about it then keep it confidential. Its their responsibility to keep secret what they want hidden from the public, which is interesting by the way..
http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2009/09/hallmark-wants-rehearing-in-first-amendment-case-against-paris-hilton/
Okay, first off, the fact that Paris has trademarked the phrase, "that's hot" is hilarious! People say that all the time and I see it everywhere! I dont' understand how they could spend time on this case but then when Dustin Hoffman was a drag Queen on a card they denied it? That's worse then Paris portryed as a waitress on a card saying, "that's hot!"...again hilarious. Ha. Ha.
Post a Comment